by the evaluator » Sun Mar 09, 2008 12:19 pm
this is what is seemed like to me- i kept getting "user offline" errors, i'd like to hear Infrants official response, i assumed this was a technical glitch, rather than the actual Dekoh functionality.
if this is actually the case, then its completely ridiculous.
the dekoh solution seems unnecessarily heavy weight and complex, especially on the client side. if you look at what maxtor has implemented now for several years with a company called Fabrik, it utilizes the web server on the NAS, rather than installing a stack on every client that might interact with the NAS. i'm not sure whose idea this was, but if i was on Infrant's product management team, i would have objected strongly.
of course my main issue is that the feature seems poorly tested and QA'd, which i guess is typical for Infrant. i've removed it, (the buggy client software kept blowing up and throwing java exceptions on my two vista machines) and the limitation on only machines with the client being able to upload photo's kind of killed it for me. if they'd just implemented the upload page on the NAS itself, it would have been much more functional. the truth is, picasa web albums is probably the best free way to share photo's.