4.2.19 apt-get key missing

[mdlaat]

Hi,

I just got myself a Ultra 2. Trying to install gcc and others, but apt-get give me an error:

# apt-get update
Get:1 http://archive.debian.org etch Release.gpg [1033B]
Hit http://archive.debian.org etch Release
Ign http://archive.debian.org etch/main Packages/DiffIndex
Hit http://archive.debian.org etch/main Packages
Get:2 http://www.readynas.com 4.2.19/ Release.gpg [490B]
Hit http://www.readynas.com 4.2.19/ Release
Err http://www.readynas.com 4.2.19/ Release

Get:3 http://www.readynas.com 4.2.19/ Release [738B]
Ign http://www.readynas.com 4.2.19/ Release
Ign http://www.readynas.com 4.2.19/ Packages/DiffIndex
Hit http://www.readynas.com 4.2.19/ Packages
Fetched 1229B in 1s (849B/s)
Reading package lists... Done
W: GPG error: http://www.readynas.com 4.2.19/ Release: The following signatures couldn't be verified because the public key is not available: NO_PUBKEY B7F02108D553259A
W: You may want to run apt-get update to correct these problems
#

Does anybody have a similar problem and/or knows how to correct it?
Thanks
Maurice

[WhoCares?]

This is a known problem and is due to be fixed in firmware 4.2.20.

-Stefan

[mdlaat]

Thank you Stefan for the prompt reply.

[kjackson]

Hi all,

I also have 4.2.19 on ReadyNAS Probusiness, and I also get these authentication errors when I try to apt-get build-essential.

Is it safe to ignore those authentication errors and let the install proceed? What will happen if I let it install and then 4.2.20 comes out with the correct keys, will it cause some sort of corruption?

Thanks in advance,

Ken

[vici]

I have the same on my brand new Ultra 2.
I need tuecrypt and so need to run apt-get.
I downgraded to 4.2.17 but the problem stays the same.
Is there a workaround?
When will 4.2.20 will be released?

[mdgm]

Regarding 4.2.20 release, see my answer in your thread: http://www.readynas.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=335958#p335958

I can't see it being released before next year.

When you downgraded to 4.2.17 did you do an "apt-get update" to ensure the 4.2.17 source list was loaded into APT?

[vici]

Hi mdgm.

After downgrading to 4.2.17 I tried to do an apt-get update, but get the same error as with 4.2.19: public key unavailable.

It was only when that did not work that I thought I would try the 4.2.20 [T19] beta (I normally would not have tried a beta). But there the link on chrirpa's page to the kernel sources does not work.
Any ideas how I can get truecrypt running?

[touffster]

I just purchased the Ultra 2 Plus this morning, upgraded the firmware unaware of this error and now I'm having the same trouble.
It's been 4moths since the last post on this thread and I find it hard to believe this hasn't been fixed yet...
Is there a fix for this and I just haven't searched for it properly?
Any information on this issue would be appreciated as I need to install a few things...

[InTheShires]

I just purchased the Ultra 2 Plus this morning, upgraded the firmware unaware of this error and now I'm having the same trouble.
It's been 4moths since the last post on this thread and I find it hard to believe this hasn't been fixed yet...
Is there a fix for this and I just haven't searched for it properly?
Any information on this issue would be appreciated as I need to install a few things...

viewtopic.php?f=35&t=14903&start=90

Check near the bottom, "WhoCares?" explains the issue.

[InTheShires]

This is a known problem and is due to be fixed in firmware 4.2.20.

-Stefan

Or not, as the case may be...

[WhoCares?]

Looks quite like Let's hope it is fixed in 4.2.21 then ...

-Stefan

[InTheShires]

Looks quite like Let's hope it is fixed in 4.2.21 then ...

-Stefan

Indeed.

Rather shoddy work though, wouldn't you agree?

[WhoCares?]

Well, strictly speaking having a working key isn't really necessary and I can imagine that there's more important stuff going on at ReadyNAS HQ than rebuilding and singing packages. That said it would still be "nice to have". Maybe I should start offering a signed repository

-Stefan

[InTheShires]

Well, strictly speaking having a working key isn't really necessary and I can imagine that there's more important stuff going on at ReadyNAS

-Stefan

Oh, I get that, and understand it.

It's just annoying, and doesn't represent the brand name very well, that a fix has been missing from the previous two(?) FW upgrades despite assurances to the contrary.

[WhoCares?]

As I said, I could offer a signed repository quite easily. Still, that wouldn't be an official repository, that's why I'm reluctant to actually do it. Also I really think that for the vast majority of users it really doesn't matter for they just install add-ons or maybe not even that. Which reminds me: I've got Cacti (almost) finished, the only thing missing is that it doesn't create graphs (well, and the Frontview interface is non-existant right now). Nevertheless: would you be interested in testing?

-Stefan